My goodness Tom.

Mwa · **Joined:** Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:29 am **Posts:** 15

My, I remember when you were lothed to even barely show Flora's crotch, allways covering it in some way, even though she had fur.
You even noted it in your ranty style thing.
But not any more! x3
I got a bit of a shock when I saw the thanks-for-voting image.
And now. :o
Nice on loosening up. ;)

~Mwa

Tom · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:54 pm

Yes, unfortunately, I've grown a little less innocent in my writing. ^_^ Personally, I don't really think it's a big deal to show her naked, it seems almost like a given nowadays, but it's true, I used to be a lot more cautious. ^_^; At least I haven't completely fallen off the deep end yet XD

Aleu · **Joined:** Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:10 pm **Posts:** 341

At least it's still kinda clean... I mean she still has fur covering all the important bits. XD

Boooooooooooooobies... Flora needs them... *gets her implants*

Typheus · **Joined:** Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:02 am **Posts:** 37

That one part where Trace ran into another Keidran and realized it was Flora because of her boobs was funny as hell. XD

geogriffith · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:42 pm

I definately like how Tom recognizes the difference between sexual tension and sexual innuendo. The former makes for great comedy and romance. The latter makes for bad PG13 summer movies.

Delusional Kangaroo · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:34 pm

Aleu wrote:

At least it's still kinda clean... I mean she still has fur covering all the important bits. XD

Boooooooooooooobies... Flora needs them... *gets her implants*

Nuuu! Flora's boobehs are perfect. Leave them alone. Anyways, yeah, I noticed that too. Although, it's not that bad. My QUITE conservative christian parents have seen Flora and dun think it's bad. =P

FoxKnight · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:48 pm

WooHoo for surviving and making a great comic for 2 years, Tom. If the comics birthday was the 22nd, that means....*counts in head* It started 5 days before I turned 13. Yes! Now I have something else important thats near my birthday (halloween being the first)
You have kinda gradually gotten into drawing Flora fully naked. She is covered by fur, so I don't see the big deal. So again, congrats and great picture of the trio

Sir Isaac · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:25 pm

Well, at least you go about it in a subtle way, unlike my graphic novel for WSC (first chapter, which is about the main character's origins, has two sex scenes. *sweatdrop* Yeah, you're much more subtle then I am...)

Aleu · **Joined:** Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:10 pm **Posts:** 341

Do Flora's breasts look bigger?

Damu · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:10 pm

I just read all the comics from begining to end, and...

Wow.

I respect that you didn't resort to nudity at first to get viewers. A great deal of webcomics do that, having nudity/sex in the first couple of panels. There was no sex until a far ways away (and even then it was simply implied/mentioned).

Anyway, great work.

Defender_16 · **Posted:** Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:01 pm

Remember this one?

Defender_16 wrote:

http://www.topwebcomics.com/
Topwebcomics has Twokinds designated as R rated. I just noticed that today while I was voting. I was thinking something along the lines of PG-13 would be a better fit. I mean it's not like you see anything, the most in the way of anthing really Romantic was Flora's Dream, and there isnt much in the way of blood.

Blind wrote:

And besides the fact that flora is always naked :roll:

gobleteer wrote:

It's PG-13 now. You DO know it's the one under the comic, right?

(No I didn't know that at the time. :D :roll: )

Defender_16 wrote:

:roll: yes there's some "almost nudity" in places......... but i still dont know wheather to count the scenes where Flora isn't wearing any clothes as nudity or not.

Moogle wrote:

Heh.... yeah. tough topic...
I definately see it as PG-13 tho....

Ok that was a skimmed verion of the conversation but you get the idea.

Michelle Zen · **Posted:** Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:43 am

nah, it's a safe comic. nothing bad bout it. for 13+ i suppose.

Mwa · **Joined:** Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:29 am **Posts:** 15

Who said there was anything bad about it?! ;P
I was condratulating(sp) him on it! :o
The only bad thing about there being more sex and nudity would mean it'd be harder to read at school. :D

Michelle Zen · **Posted:** Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:12 am

i was more like directing that post at topwebcomics.

Defender_16 · **Posted:** Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:55 pm

My comment was that topwebcomics DID rate it is PG-13. Just I read the ranking list wrong and was looking at the rating for whatever comic was above Twokinds at the time.

(Back when we were in 32nd place. :roll: "Everyone vote! We can get to thirty!")

So I thought at the time TWC had changed the comics rating because in the comic before, Flora didn't have any clothes on.

Twokinds ARCHIVE Forums

My goodness Tom.

Who is online