Twokinds ARCHIVE Forums

This forum is for the preservation of old threads from before the forum pruning.
It is currently Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

What OS are you using?
Windows 9x,2K, or XP 82%  82%  [ 51 ]
Linux (Tell us what Distro) 11%  11%  [ 7 ]
Mac (Say what version) 6%  6%  [ 4 ]
Other (Tell us what!) =D 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 62
Author Message
 Post subject: OS Preference
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:52 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
So, what OS's do you guys use, and why?

I personally use Windows XP, because I am working on learning C#.NET and ASP.NET.

And if this turns into a flamewar or MS Flame session, lockage will follow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:57 pm 
Offline
Master
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 12:42 am
Posts: 271
Windows XP, because Mac is EVIL. And a Mac mouse only has ONE button, ONE BUTTON! *continues ranting about macs* I generally use XP because its more conveniant. But since I'm a computer junkyard in my city I also have Win95,Win98,Win98 SE, and Win3.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:04 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
Takyoji wrote:
Windows XP, because Mac is EVIL. And a Mac mouse only has ONE button, ONE BUTTON! *continues ranting about macs* I generally use XP because its more conveint. But since I'm a computer junkyard in my city I also have Win95,Win98,Win98 SE, and Win3.1
Macs aren't that bad, and I think they have two button mice now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline
Master
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 256
Location: right here
I mostly use Windows XP because every game i have uses it but i also have Linux Redhat, which i am using now *does Linux kicks Microsoft butt dance*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:51 pm 
Offline
Resident Rule Nazi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:52 pm
Posts: 1122
I've been using Windows 2000 Professional since 2002, when I first recieved my computer.

Windows 2000 pro is more stable than XP, but in turn does not have some of the excellent features such as system restore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:02 pm 
I like XP, but I always will think that 98 is a better and more stable OP (except for the lack of the New Found Hardware Wiz.)

EDIT: The last MAC I ever used was one from like, 1994 in like, 4th grade.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:03 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
kenji wrote:
I like XP, but I always will think that 98 is a better and more stable OP (except for the lack of the New Found Hardware Wiz.)
98 is nowhere near as stable as XP. I use 98 and XP on two different computers, and the XP one runs SOO much better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:20 pm 
Offline
Strike *

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 7:24 pm
Posts: 70
Location: Buried 1 foot under.
98 is reasonably stable, if you know what you're doing. But it's no longer compatible with anything beyond web browsing, and the lack of things like the ability to close processes really hamper it. It's still useful for old programs (read: games) that don't work in XP (even with the compatibility override thing).

XP is really the only consumer-oriented OS right now. And I'm not dissing Linux (I'm going to be able to resize my ntfs partition in a few weeks, and then I'll finally be able to get back into learning linux :D), but the target audiences are entirely different.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:34 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
Geogriffith wrote:
98 is reasonably stable, if you know what you're doing. But it's no longer compatible with anything beyond web browsing, and the lack of things like the ability to close processes really hamper it. It's still useful for old programs (read: games) that don't work in XP (even with the compatibility override thing).

XP is really the only consumer-oriented OS right now. And I'm not dissing Linux (I'm going to be able to resize my ntfs partition in a few weeks, and then I'll finally be able to get back into learning linux :D), but the target audiences are entirely different.
Macs are reasonably consumer oriented, and I would reccomend them to people, though they do lack some of the programs that windows has, unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:27 am 
Offline
Strike *

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 7:24 pm
Posts: 70
Location: Buried 1 foot under.
A Mac is... ok, if you're very computer-illiterate, and don't mind being very limited in how much you can do. Windows is a decent in-between: It's got big icons and a simple interface, but you can also do a little bit of behind-the-scenes work. Linux is powerful as hell, but is so customizable and overwhelming that it is really only suitable for pros.

I really wouldn't ever recommend a Mac. It's like an enabler. "Ooh, I'm not going to read a few books and learn how to use a computer, I'm just going to go for the one already designed for dummies." I started at college just a month ago, and it's unbeleivable how many people are incapable of such simple things as connecting their computers to the network.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:54 am 
Offline
Citizen
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 73
Location: Dieter Meyers Institution
Windows 2k T_T


Although I feel NO love for Mac...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:59 pm 
Offline
Apprentice
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:56 am
Posts: 131
Location: /dev/null
just bought me a T42 (you know IBM ThinkPad). I think I will mostly use Linux on it, since IBM TPs are well supported under Linux thanks to IBM. ... just got into crazy laughing when i had read the hardware recommendation for Vista (fka Longhorn). So, i won't be going on that way, at least at my home PC, what i have to use at work doesn't really matter me. I get along with Windows and Linux (and Novell), some OSes seem to have more problems than others (at least in my job i get paid for fixing damned Windows-Boxes, so a migration to Linux maybe would make me workless :wink: ), darn Windows NT4.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:37 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
kaiser wrote:
just bought me a T42 (you know IBM ThinkPad). I think I will mostly use Linux on it, since IBM TPs are well supported under Linux thanks to IBM. ... just got into crazy laughing when i had read the hardware recommendation for Vista (fka Longhorn). So, i won't be going on that way, at least at my home PC, what i have to use at work doesn't really matter me. I get along with Windows and Linux (and Novell), some OSes seem to have more problems than others (at least in my job i get paid for fixing darn Windows-Boxes, so a migration to Linux maybe would make me workless :wink: ), darn Windows NT4.
I personally think Vista will be worth it though, expecially considering I've used it. My dad is an MSDN subscriber and has the Beta 1 of Windows Vista running in a virtual machine on one of his work computers. =D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:19 pm 
Offline
Apprentice
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:56 am
Posts: 131
Location: /dev/null
Delusional Kangaroo wrote:
I personally think Vista will be worth it though, expecially considering I've used it. My dad is an MSDN subscriber and has the Beta 1 of Windows Vista running in a virtual machine on one of his work computers. =D

and what has it got what Windows XP has not?

[ ]Indexing = Delayed for next version
[ ]New Filesystem (WinFS) = Delayed
[ ]Monad, Unix-like Command Shell = Delayed

[X]New Version of the crappiest Browser ever
[X]Some new GUI-Features
[X]New Windows-Games (updated Minesweeper, ...)
[X]more Digital Restrictions Management (aka DRM)

and therefore i had to pay a HighEnd-GPU, -CPU and Tons of RAM? Never ... And I bet that this is not only my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:35 pm 
Offline
Templar Inner Circle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:55 am
Posts: 2885
Location: Somewhere in my pants.
kaiser wrote:
[ ]Indexing = Delayed for next version
[ ]New Filesystem (WinFS) = Delayed
[ ]Monad, Unix-like Command Shell = Delayed

[X]New Version of the crappiest Browser ever
[X]Some new GUI-Features
[X]New Windows-Games (updated Minesweeper, ...)
[X]more Digital Restrictions Management (aka DRM)

IE 7 will be for all windows systems, and IE wasn't the crappiest browser to begin with, it just doesn't have the functionality of Firefox and others. Plus, IE 7 is going to be just as good as Firefox, seeing as I've used the Beta 1 of it as well. And on another note, the DRM won't hurt anything if you don't use anything illegal anyways. I'm strictly against software piracy, so it wouldn't hamper anything I do. And having used the Beta of Vista, I can tell it will still improve on XP a lot, even if it doesn't have everything they wanted to put in it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group