Eshenaleros wrote:
has anybody ever considered the power of our imaginations? probably not. okay then, think about this
i have a theory that every person has at least one world that they end up forming from their thoughts. these worlds exist completely seperately from our own but with it - one for each person on the planet, housing their thoughts, ideas, a personal creations. taking this into account, the twokinds world would be a completely existant place, seperate but co-existant.
however, this also means that the creatures in this place may have an imagination that can create a world of their own, creating a cycle, and also opening up the question of were we thought up by someone?
sorry, just had to get that out there *shrugs*
Your theory is the logical opposite of Plato's "Idealistic" world, where the "true" version of everything existed. Before I get to my point, I'll need to explain this further.
You're probably sitting in a chair. And you have seen different chairs in furniture stores. They are all chairs- but undoubtedly, the two thousand dollar massaging recliner at Sharper Image is different from the office chair I'm sitting in now. Yet they are both chairs. Plato believed all people were mentally linked to an "ideal world" where, basically, the ultimate version of everything existed. In this case, the ultimate chair. It would be from that chair that we derived all concepts related to chairs, and how we could tell the similarities between recliners, office chairs, massage chairs, theater seats, etc.
You believe in a concept where people create their own ideal worlds. This is true in a sense- the brain does indeed create a sort of common environment, a world, in which all a man's thoughts can be contained. To say that your statement is true could indicate two possibilities:
A) Brainwaves have a profound effect on alternate universes we are not aware of- in this case, people should probably be more careful what they think. It means there were real kids somewhere being eaten by a clown when Stephen King wrote
It, or a real dark god rising from the seas to wreak havoc upon mankind when H.P. Lovecraft wrote
Call of Cthulhu. Also, considering mankind can put such "universes" out of his head for weeks, (Which, if we are to keep this theory, could only, logically, destroy the universe, as it is sustained only by the said man's thoughts) it also means that we must indeed have a praiseworthy creator, as he would seem to have astounding control over his mind just to keep us from being utterly obliterated within the span of every five minutes.
In this case, the only we could avoid a cycle of possibly trillions of ended lives would be to constantly sustain that world in our minds. Such intense concentration would probably not be within the ability of most, if any, human beings. However, it is also possible that, since the thinker in question never imagined those people being obliterated, then they never, as far as they were concerned, were.
B) Alternate universes exist on levels we are incapable of understanding, perhaps on an infinitesimally small level. Imprints are made by our minds that form universes within the gluons, neurons, and photons of the atoms of our brain nodes. Similar implications exist for B as there are for A- After all, a person's a person, no matter how small. But then again, it is less likely that these people would be in a state of constant obliteration. However, it is also more likely that their obliteration would be, literally, Biblical in proportion, since the only way they could be destroyed would be something physically happing to those particles that house, or perhaps are, their universe. Every time you forgot a character, he would literally see the world crashing down upon him, quake in fear as every part of his being was totally destroyed.
For the sake of my conscience's own well-being, I would prefer to reject your belief.