Twokinds ARCHIVE Forums

Well all the evidence presented against OJ was able to be disproved or contradicted one way or another. So there was still reasonable doubt, and with reasonable doubt, you can't vote guilty. There was not a single thing 100% confirming that he killed anybody. And a lot of suspicious activity on the LAPD's part, so the jury (which had some black people on it who generally hate the LAPD because it is pretty racist) wasn't having any of it.

He may or may not have done it, but in the end, there was a healthy amount of reasonable doubt and you just can't convict someone with that.

First off let me say that i'm rather amused at the whole story surrounding him, and kind of thrown for loop at all the people who see him as a monster of some kind, when I don't think he is, but that's just me.

Sure, the man is crazy, i mean...REALLY crazy, but is it that crazy to go take back items that were taken from you on a rather fubar manner? Ok yes, but that's not the point! Leave the man alone, give him back his stuff and let the past go, no matter how funny it was to see that white Bronco on the television.

I still say he didn't do it.

O.J. DID NOT DO IT!!!!\

Go Go-Action Bronco...AWAY!

Maybe he could film the new Naked Gun film from D-Block?